

How this scoreline is calculated
Our model scores this match once both teams have enough recent form to work from, predictions publish in the days before kickoff. Form, head-to-head and season stats are available in the tabs above now.
Where those opponents sat in the table: strong means they averaged roughly the top 40%, weak roughly the bottom 40%, mixed in between.
Opposition faced: New England Revolution mixed, Chicago Fire FC mixedThe form score weights every result and every goal by where the opponent sat in the table, so five wins over the bottom of the table score below five over the top.




New England Revolution take a form score of 4.2 out of 10 into this MLS fixture, against 6.4 for Chicago Fire FC. New England Revolution have 1 win, 2 draws and 2 defeats in their last 5, while Chicago Fire FC have 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 defeat in theirs. Across the season New England Revolution average 1.4 goals scored and 1.1 conceded per game, Chicago Fire FC 1.8 and 1.4. New England Revolution have kept a clean sheet in 25% of their matches this season, Chicago Fire FC in 10%. In their last 10 meetings New England Revolution have won 1, drawn 7 and lost 2. New England Revolution sit 4th on 34 points, Chicago Fire FC 3rd on 36.
Form, head-to-head and season statistics are free to read. The model's predictions for this fixture are in the cards above.
Chicago Fire FC arrive at this fixture with the sort of momentum that turns tight table margins into statement victories. Their perfect five-match winning run, all competitions included, has delivered 11 goals scored and just 4 conceded, leaving them 3rd in the table on 32 points and one place above New England Revolution. The hosts sit 4th on 30 points from 19 matches, but their recent form score of 2.5 out of 10 tells a story of fragility: only 1 win and 2 draws from their last 5, including consecutive defeats to Toronto FC (1-2 away) and Houston Dynamo (0-2 at home). That 5.1-point form gap in Chicago's favour is the widest angle on this fixture and suggests the table does not yet reflect the difference in current trajectory.
New England's season profile reveals a side that controls possession, averaging 55.4 percent across an 8-match sample, and generates volume with 13.5 shots per game. Yet that territorial edge has not translated into goals: they have failed to score in 50 percent of their matches this season, managing just 1.53 per game in league play, and they have kept a clean sheet in only 12 percent of fixtures. The 4-1 home win over Atlanta United remains their sole victory in the last 5, and both goalless draws and narrow losses have become the pattern. Across those recent outings they have scored 7 and conceded 7, a split that underlines inconsistency but also shows defensive leaks remain an issue despite the possession numbers.
Chicago Fire FC have won 10 of 18 league matches and score at 1.89 per game, the highest rate among the top four. Their 5-match winning streak includes three Leagues Cup fixtures, all won by two-goal margins or better: 3-1 at home to Santos Laguna, 2-0 at home to Necaxa, and 2-1 away to Cruz Azul. Back in MLS action they edged Portland Timbers 2-1 at home and Charlotte 2-1 at home before that, showing an ability to grind out narrow wins when the knockout tournament format demanded it. They have not failed to score once in that 9-match sample, and their expected goals of 1.64 per game sits marginally below New England's 1.59, suggesting similar underlying creation but far superior finishing and confidence. They have conceded 24 in 18 league matches, a rate of 1.33 per game that almost mirrors New England's 1.32, but their recent defensive record of 4 conceded in 5 is notably tighter.
The head to head record across the last 10 meetings shows 1 win for New England, 2 for Chicago and 7 draws, with both teams scoring in 8 of those 10 and over 2.5 goals landing in 6. The most recent clash exactly one year ago finished 2-2, and before that Chicago won 3-2 away and 3-1 at home, while New England's sole victory in the sample came 1-0 away in May 2024. That 3.2 goals per meeting average and the frequency of draws point to tight, open contests, but all three itemised Chicago wins came with multiple goals scored, and the pattern of shared goals fits both sides' leaky defensive profiles this season. The gap in form and league output, however, has widened since those meetings, and Chicago's current run makes them a different proposition from the side that drew here last October.
Formatic's model will price this fixture closer to kick-off, but the data already frames the challenge clearly. New England's possession and shot volume have not been enough to prevent a slide into poor form, and their 50 percent blank rate at home to sides averaging fewer shots on target than Chicago makes goals hard to trust. Chicago have won all 5 of their last matches, score in every fixture, and sit higher in the table despite playing one game fewer. The question is whether New England's territorial control can disrupt that rhythm or whether Chicago's sharper edge in both boxes extends a streak that has already carried them through league and cup. The numbers suggest the visitors hold the value and the momentum, with the head to head draws offering the only historical brake on that logic.
Tomorrow's top pick, free, the moment it drops
Every pick is posted to the free Telegram channel before kickoff and the full record stays public, win or lose.
Join the free Telegram